0.12/0.13 % Problem : Vampire---4.8_13849 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.12/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 1440 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 180 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Jul 3 12:58:02 EDT 2023 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime : 0.21/0.48 Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Aur8RN5jS9/Vampire---4.8_13849 0.21/0.49 # Version: 3.1pre001-ho 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 900s (5) cores 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_ho_3 with 180s (1) cores 0.21/0.50 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 180s (1) cores 0.21/0.50 # ehoh_best2_full_lfho with pid 14183 completed with status 0 0.21/0.50 # Result found by ehoh_best2_full_lfho 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 900s (5) cores 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_ho_3 with 180s (1) cores 0.21/0.50 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 180s (1) cores 0.21/0.50 # No SInE strategy applied 0.21/0.50 # Search class: HUUPM-FFMM00-SSSFFFNN 0.21/0.50 # partial match(3): HUUPF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores 0.21/0.50 # new_ho_10 with pid 14189 completed with status 0 0.21/0.50 # Result found by new_ho_10 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 900s (5) cores 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_ho_3 with 180s (1) cores 0.21/0.50 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 180s (1) cores 0.21/0.50 # No SInE strategy applied 0.21/0.50 # Search class: HUUPM-FFMM00-SSSFFFNN 0.21/0.50 # partial match(3): HUUPF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.21/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.21/0.50 0.21/0.50 # Proof found! 0.21/0.50 # SZS status Theorem 0.21/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.21/0.50 thf(decl_22, type, esk1_0: a > a > a). 0.21/0.50 thf(decl_23, type, esk2_0: a > a > a). 0.21/0.50 thf(decl_24, type, esk3_0: a). 0.21/0.50 thf(decl_25, type, esk4_0: a). 0.21/0.50 thf(decl_26, type, esk5_0: a). 0.21/0.50 thf(decl_27, type, esk6_0: a). 0.21/0.50 thf(decl_28, type, esk7_0: a). 0.21/0.50 thf(c3_DIAMOND_THM_pme, conjecture, ![X1:a > a > a, X2:a > a > a]:(((~(![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:(((X2 @ X3 @ (X1 @ X4 @ X5))=(X1 @ (X2 @ X3 @ X4) @ (X2 @ X3 @ X5)))))<=?[X3:a, X4:a, X6:a, X7:a, X8:a]:((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((X6)!=(X7))&((X6)!=(X8)))&((X6)!=(X4)))&((X7)!=(X3)))&((X2 @ X3 @ X4)=(X4)))&((X2 @ X3 @ X6)=(X6)))&((X1 @ X3 @ X6)=(X3)))&((X2 @ X3 @ X7)=(X7)))&((X2 @ X3 @ X8)=(X8)))&((X2 @ X6 @ X7)=(X4)))&((X2 @ X6 @ X8)=(X4)))&((X2 @ X6 @ X4)=(X4)))&((X2 @ X7 @ X4)=(X4)))&((X2 @ X8 @ X4)=(X4)))&((X1 @ X8 @ X4)=(X8)))&((X1 @ X7 @ X4)=(X7)))&((X1 @ X7 @ X8)=(X3)))&((X2 @ X7 @ X8)=(X4)))&((X1 @ X6 @ X4)=(X6)))&((X1 @ X6 @ X8)=(X3)))&((X1 @ X6 @ X7)=(X3)))&((X1 @ X3 @ X8)=(X3)))&((X1 @ X3 @ X7)=(X3)))&((X1 @ X3 @ X4)=(X3)))&((X3)!=(X4)))&((X8)!=(X4)))&((X8)!=(X3)))&((X7)!=(X4)))&((X7)!=(X8)))&((X6)!=(X3)))))<=(((((((![X3:a]:(((X2 @ X3 @ X3)=(X3)))&![X3:a, X4:a]:(((X1 @ (X2 @ X3 @ X4) @ X4)=(X4))))&![X3:a, X4:a]:(((X2 @ (X1 @ X3 @ X4) @ X4)=(X4))))&![X3:a, X4:a]:(((X2 @ X3 @ X4)=(X2 @ X4 @ X3))))&![X3:a, X4:a]:(((X1 @ X3 @ X4)=(X1 @ X4 @ X3))))&![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:(((X2 @ (X2 @ X3 @ X4) @ X5)=(X2 @ X3 @ (X2 @ X4 @ X5)))))&![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:(((X1 @ (X1 @ X3 @ X4) @ X5)=(X1 @ X3 @ (X1 @ X4 @ X5)))))&![X3:a]:(((X1 @ X3 @ X3)=(X3)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Aur8RN5jS9/Vampire---4.8_13849', c3_DIAMOND_THM_pme)). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:a > a > a, X2:a > a > a]:(((((((((![X3:a]:(((X2 @ X3 @ X3)=(X3)))&![X3:a, X4:a]:(((X1 @ (X2 @ X3 @ X4) @ X4)=(X4))))&![X3:a, X4:a]:(((X2 @ (X1 @ X3 @ X4) @ X4)=(X4))))&![X3:a, X4:a]:(((X2 @ X3 @ X4)=(X2 @ X4 @ X3))))&![X3:a, X4:a]:(((X1 @ X3 @ X4)=(X1 @ X4 @ X3))))&![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:(((X2 @ (X2 @ X3 @ X4) @ X5)=(X2 @ X3 @ (X2 @ X4 @ X5)))))&![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:(((X1 @ (X1 @ X3 @ X4) @ X5)=(X1 @ X3 @ (X1 @ X4 @ X5)))))&![X3:a]:(((X1 @ X3 @ X3)=(X3))))=>(?[X3:a, X4:a, X6:a, X7:a, X8:a]:((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((X6)!=(X7))&((X6)!=(X8)))&((X6)!=(X4)))&((X7)!=(X3)))&((X2 @ X3 @ X4)=(X4)))&((X2 @ X3 @ X6)=(X6)))&((X1 @ X3 @ X6)=(X3)))&((X2 @ X3 @ X7)=(X7)))&((X2 @ X3 @ X8)=(X8)))&((X2 @ X6 @ X7)=(X4)))&((X2 @ X6 @ X8)=(X4)))&((X2 @ X6 @ X4)=(X4)))&((X2 @ X7 @ X4)=(X4)))&((X2 @ X8 @ X4)=(X4)))&((X1 @ X8 @ X4)=(X8)))&((X1 @ X7 @ X4)=(X7)))&((X1 @ X7 @ X8)=(X3)))&((X2 @ X7 @ X8)=(X4)))&((X1 @ X6 @ X4)=(X6)))&((X1 @ X6 @ X8)=(X3)))&((X1 @ X6 @ X7)=(X3)))&((X1 @ X3 @ X8)=(X3)))&((X1 @ X3 @ X7)=(X3)))&((X1 @ X3 @ X4)=(X3)))&((X3)!=(X4)))&((X8)!=(X4)))&((X8)!=(X3)))&((X7)!=(X4)))&((X7)!=(X8)))&((X6)!=(X3))))=>~(![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:(((X2 @ X3 @ (X1 @ X4 @ X5))=(X1 @ (X2 @ X3 @ X4) @ (X2 @ X3 @ X5))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[c3_DIAMOND_THM_pme])])). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X37:a, X38:a, X39:a, X40:a, X41:a, X42:a, X43:a, X44:a, X45:a, X46:a, X47:a, X48:a, X49:a, X50:a, X51:a, X52:a, X58:a, X59:a, X60:a]:(((((((((((esk2_0 @ X37 @ X37)=(X37))&((esk1_0 @ (esk2_0 @ X38 @ X39) @ X39)=(X39)))&((esk2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X40 @ X41) @ X41)=(X41)))&((esk2_0 @ X42 @ X43)=(esk2_0 @ X43 @ X42)))&((esk1_0 @ X44 @ X45)=(esk1_0 @ X45 @ X44)))&((esk2_0 @ (esk2_0 @ X46 @ X47) @ X48)=(esk2_0 @ X46 @ (esk2_0 @ X47 @ X48))))&((esk1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X49 @ X50) @ X51)=(esk1_0 @ X49 @ (esk1_0 @ X50 @ X51))))&((esk1_0 @ X52 @ X52)=(X52)))&((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((esk5_0)!=(esk6_0))&((esk5_0)!=(esk7_0)))&((esk5_0)!=(esk4_0)))&((esk6_0)!=(esk3_0)))&((esk2_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0)=(esk4_0)))&((esk2_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk5_0)=(esk5_0)))&((esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk5_0)=(esk3_0)))&((esk2_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk6_0)=(esk6_0)))&((esk2_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk7_0)=(esk7_0)))&((esk2_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)=(esk4_0)))&((esk2_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk7_0)=(esk4_0)))&((esk2_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk4_0)=(esk4_0)))&((esk2_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk4_0)=(esk4_0)))&((esk2_0 @ esk7_0 @ esk4_0)=(esk4_0)))&((esk1_0 @ esk7_0 @ esk4_0)=(esk7_0)))&((esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk4_0)=(esk6_0)))&((esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0)=(esk3_0)))&((esk2_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0)=(esk4_0)))&((esk1_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk4_0)=(esk5_0)))&((esk1_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk7_0)=(esk3_0)))&((esk1_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)=(esk3_0)))&((esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk7_0)=(esk3_0)))&((esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk6_0)=(esk3_0)))&((esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0)=(esk3_0)))&((esk3_0)!=(esk4_0)))&((esk7_0)!=(esk4_0)))&((esk7_0)!=(esk3_0)))&((esk6_0)!=(esk4_0)))&((esk6_0)!=(esk7_0)))&((esk5_0)!=(esk3_0)))&((esk2_0 @ X58 @ (esk1_0 @ X59 @ X60))=(esk1_0 @ (esk2_0 @ X58 @ X59) @ (esk2_0 @ X58 @ X60)))))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:(((esk2_0 @ X3 @ (esk1_0 @ X4 @ X5))=(esk1_0 @ (esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4) @ (esk2_0 @ X3 @ X5)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ((esk2_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk7_0)=(esk4_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a, X3:a]:(((esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4)=(esk1_0 @ X4 @ X3))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a]:(((esk1_0 @ esk4_0 @ (esk2_0 @ esk5_0 @ X3))=(esk2_0 @ esk5_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ esk7_0)))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4]), c_0_5])). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ((esk2_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)=(esk4_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a]:(((esk1_0 @ X3 @ X3)=(X3))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ((esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0)=(esk3_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a, X3:a]:(((esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4)=(esk2_0 @ X4 @ X3))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ((esk2_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk5_0)=(esk5_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ((esk5_0)!=(esk4_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7]), c_0_8]), c_0_9]), c_0_10]), c_0_11]), c_0_12]), ['proof']). 0.21/0.50 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.21/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 2 0.21/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses : 40 0.21/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 39 0.21/0.50 # Processed clauses : 137 0.21/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 20 0.21/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0 0.21/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 117 0.21/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.21/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.21/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.21/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 9 0.21/0.50 # Generated clauses : 579 0.21/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 313 0.21/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.21/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.21/0.50 # Paramodulations : 579 0.21/0.50 # Factorizations : 0 0.21/0.50 # NegExts : 0 0.21/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.21/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 679 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.21/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.21/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.21/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.21/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 69 0.21/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 57 0.21/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2 0.21/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 10 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 0 0.21/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 244 0.21/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 244 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 48 0.21/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0 0.21/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 0.21/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1 0.21/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 123 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 112 0.21/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 137 0.21/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0 0.21/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6479 0.21/0.50 0.21/0.50 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.015 s 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.000 s 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.015 s 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1916 pages 0.21/0.50 0.21/0.50 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.016 s 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.003 s 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.018 s 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages 0.21/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting 0.21/0.51 EOF